Auto-generate Flow Chart from Java/C++ Codes:

Raptor Flowchart Tutorial For Beginners

Monday, February 24, 2014

Flappy Bird app disappears mysteriously


-----

Flappy Bird app disappears mysteriously

Quotable

Posted: Sunday, February 23, 2014 8:07 pm

The game seems so simple: tap the screen of your phone to keep a small yellow, blue or red bird from hitting the Mario-esque pipes. Every time you clear a pipe, you get a point. But, as simple as it seems, it proves to be quite a challenge, even for those with scores of over 100.
“The game was like five minutes long and it took me about 100 tries,” Emmy Khan, a sophomore dietetics major, said. Her high score is 110.

Flappy Bird was released in May 2013 by Vietnamese game developer Dong Nguyen through. GEARS Studios but didn’t become popular until Jan. 2014. It went viral after word spread about its difficulty and in January the game topped the Free Apps charts.
Some frustrated players took to the App Store to post some creative reviews, trying in vain to warn other players against downloading the game. The pleas did not go unnoticed by Nguyen, who later took the game down.
“Flappy Bird was designed to play in a few minutes when you are relaxed. But it happened to become an addictive product. I think it has become a problem. To solve that problem, it’s best to take down ‘Flappy Bird.’ It’s gone forever,” Nguyen said in an interview with Forbes.
It seems that the majority of Flappy Bird players find the game anything but relaxing.
“It’s just so aggravating,” Alex Maben, a sophomore media arts and design and English double major, said. “It seems so simple. The fact that I can’t do it almost seems like an insult. How hard can it be to get a stupid bird through some pipes by tapping a screen?”
It was these types of comments that pushed Nguyen to remove the game from the App Store and Google Play.
He later took to Twitter to explain. “I can call Flappy Bird a success of mine. But it also ruins my simple life. So now I hate it,” Nguyen tweeted. “I am sorry Flappy Bird users, 22 hours from now, I will take Flappy Bird down. I cannot take this anymore.”
Nguyen stayed true to his word and removed Flappy Bird from the App Store on Feb. 9, 2014, which prevents new users from downloading and playing the game. Some people with the app still loaded on their phone have even gone as far as putting it up for sale on eBay, one as expensive as $12,000.
“It ought to be simple, but it’s not. That’s why it’s so addicting. You want to prove that you can ‘beat’ the stupid thing, if that’s possible,” Maben said.
Some people were able to ignore the hype surrounding the game. Joseph Kuykendall, a sophomore media arts and design major, understands the hype surrounding the game although he has never tried the game and never plans to.
“I understand where it comes from, because I myself am a part of the Candy Crush addiction — which in a sense is very similar,” Kuykendall said. “I didn’t get involved with Flappy Bird because I knew it would be another waste of time.”
But not everyone sees Flappy Bird the same way.
“Flappy Bird is too simple of a concept to not try to be the best in,” Khan said. She claims that she’ll never delete the app from her phone.
Despite the efforts of Nguyen to squash the addiction, it seems that Flappy Bird will continue to soar across phone screens for a long time to come.
Contact Lauren Hunt at huntle@dukes.jmu.edu.
-----
copied from: http://www.breezejmu.org/life/article_17567b54-9cf0-11e3-a025-0017a43b2370.html
-----
further reading: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flappy_Bird

Nokia launches first Android phones

-----

Nokia launches first Android phones

BBC Technology Correspondent Mark Gregory is shown the new X range of Nokia smartphones at the Mobile World Congress in Barcelona

Related Stories

Nokia has unveiled its first family of Android phones at the Mobile World Conference in Barcelona.
The X, X+ and XL will range in price from 89 euros (£74) to 109 euros.
Up until now Nokia's suite of smartphones has used the Windows operating system. The announcement had been widely expected despite Microsoft detailing plans to buy Nokia's mobile division at the end of 2013.
Analysts have called the announcement a "perplexing strategic move".
The entry-level X model will feature a 4in (10.2cm) screen with 512MB Ram and a three-megapixel camera. The X+ will have 768MB Ram and a 4GB MicroSD card.
X phones
The top-end XL will have a 5in screen, a front-facing two-megapixel camera and a rear five-megapixel camera.
The X will go on sale immediately in several territories including Europe and Asia Pacific. The X+ and XL will launch in April.
Users who buy one of the X models will be able to use Microsoft's free cloud-storage system, OneDrive. The software giant's email software, Outlook, will also ship as standard on all models.
'Bitter pill'
The messaging service BlackBerry Messenger (BBM) will be pre-installed on the phones as will social network Twitter, video app Vine and the game Plants vs. Zombies 2.
More than 1.1 million devices running Android are expected to ship this year compared with 360,000 using the Windows operating system, according to data from research analysts Gartner.
Microsoft agreed to buy Nokia's mobile phone business in a deal worth 5.4bn euros ($7.2bn; £4.6bn).
At the time, the company's then chief executive, Steve Ballmer, called the deal a "big, bold step forward", adding the company was in the process of transforming itself from one that "was known for software and PCs, to a company that focuses on devices and services".
Critics say Microsoft has been too slow to respond to the booming market for mobile devices.
X phonesNokia hopes the phones will appeal to customers in emerging markets
Nokia was once a leader in mobile phones but has struggled in recent years.
The growth area for mobile phone companies is now in emerging markets, where low-cost Android models sell particularly well.
Analysts CCS Insight head of research Ben Wood said: "Nokia was caught between a rock and a hard place.
"Non-participation‎ in the low-cost smartphone market where Android is rampant leaves a lot of money on the table but turning to Android must have been a bitter pill to swallow.
"If you stand back, for a soon-to-be Microsoft-owned company to embrace Android is a perplexing strategic move.
"I believe it was a ‎decision where Nokia felt it had few other options given Android's entry-level dominance in phones and apps, particularly in emerging markets," he added.
Lumia phonesNokia runs Windows on its Lumia range of smartphones
The deal between Microsoft and Nokia has not yet been finalised, and at a Microsoft press conference on Sunday the vice-president of operating systems for Windows, Joe Belfiore, was asked what he thought about Nokia's decision to launch an Android phone.
He replied: "Some things we're excited about, some things we're less excited about. Whatever they do, we're very supportive of them."
Mr Wood believes that despite Monday's announcement Nokia's primary focus remains its Windows phones.
"Given its looming ownership by Microsoft, it will be doing everything it can to get Microsoft to push Windows ‎Phone down to the entry-level smartphone space and will be hoping it's flirtation with Android does not dilute this," he said.
Nokia's senior vice president Stephen Elop confirmed that the Lumina remains "our primary smartphone platform" and that the X range would be used as a "feeder system",
-----
copied from: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-26320552

Sunday, February 23, 2014

Have you ever received a missed call from number 0327811900?



I had. And when I checked with Uncle Google, it turned out to be a popular number!

Click to Google it now! (No Trick Here)

After 15 months, Windows 8 has sold 100 million fewer copies than Windows 7 did


While consumers are certainly still buying Windows 8, the latest and greatest operating system from Microsoft is not getting the same amount of love as Windows 7 did. That seems to be the general consensus, but now there’s data straight from the horse’s mouth to back that claim: at 15 months, Windows 8 sold 100 million fewer licenses than Windows 7 did, according to Microsoft’s own sales figures.
Microsoft today revealed that Windows 8 has passed the 200 million mark. The two operating systems grew at the same rate for their respective first six months, but then at some point things slowed down for Windows 7′s successor:
windows 7 windows 8 15 months After 15 months, Windows 8 has sold 100 million fewer copies than Windows 7 did
We can’t say when exactly the slowdown occurred because Microsoft didn’t share any new Windows 8 sales numbers between 100 million (six months) and 200 million (15 months). We can, however, point out that 2013 saw the worst yearly decline in PC shipments ever, so it shouldn’t be too surprising that Microsoft wasn’t eager to update anyone at 12 months. What we do know is broken down below.
Windows 7 launched on October 22, 2009. In October 2010, Microsoft revealed that it had sold over 240 million Windows 7 licenses in the operating system’s first year, and in January 2011 that number grew to 300 million at the 15-month mark.
Windows 8 launched on October 26, 2012. In February 2014, Microsoft revealed that it had sold over 200 million Windows 8 licenses in the operating system’s 15 months. No matter how you slice it, that’s not good news for the company.
What’s next? Microsoft is going to continue pushing updates for Windows 8 in the coming months (Windows 8.1 is already out and Windows 8.1 Update 1 is on its way), up until it’s ready to release Windows 9. The company is expected to talk about both at its Build conference between April 2 and 4 in San Francisco.

copied from: http://thenextweb.com/microsoft/2014/02/13/15-months-windows-8-sold-100-million-fewer-copies-windows-7/#!wXyT1

Friday, February 21, 2014

Five most influential technology companies (as at 21st February 2014)

-----
There are five technology companies that matter.
In order of influence, they are, Apple, Google, Facebook, Amazon, and Microsoft.
Let's look at what these companies have done in the past three months.
Which thing in that list is not like the others?
In case you can't figure it out, it's Apple's boring buy back.

Why did Facebook buy WhatsApp?

-----

Facebook’s WhatsApp Acquisition Explained

Also: How you, too, can make a $19 billion smartphone app. Also: Not really.


WhatsApp





Now that Facebook is planning to acquire WhatsApp for $19 billion, perhaps your head is swimming with questions. Among them: How can I also make billions of dollars by selling my mobile app to Facebook? As someone who writes about technology for a living and who’s definitely not a billionaire, I can’t answer that for you. But I can help with some other things you might want to know:

What is WhatsApp?

It’s a messaging app you can use in place of your wireless carrier’s regular texting service. You enter your phone number and WhatsApp looks through your contact list for other people who are using the app. Then you can message those users all you want without limits or overage charges. The app is available on many platforms and is free to download and has no ads, but it costs $1 per year after the first year.

How popular is it?

Right now, WhatsApp has more than 450 million active users — meaning they use the service at least once a month — compared to 1.23 billion for Facebook. Those users send 500 million pictures back and forth per day, about 150 million more than Facebook.

How much money is $19 billion in the startup world, exactly?

A lot. My colleague Harry McCracken put together a chart of big startup acquisitions, and WhatsApp is the biggest. Most deals don’t come anywhere close. Bigger companies tend to change hands for a lot more money, however. For instance, Comcast wants to buy Time Warner Cable for $45 billion.

Is Facebook going to kill WhatsApp and/or ruin it with advertisements?

That’s not the plan. Facebook says WhatsApp will act like an independent company and stay in its own Mountain View, Calif. headquarters. The product will stay ad-free, and the two companies will focus on growth for the next few years. Then, they’ll figure out how to make money in some way that doesn’t involve shoveling ads into the app. (Harvesting all that sweet, sweet user data for targeted ads on Facebook or Instagram would be the safe bet, but more on that shortly.)

Is WhatsApp going to change at all, then?

WhatApp says nothing will change. Perhaps the $1 per year charge will go away at some point, given that Facebook says it’s not a big priority to expand subscriptions.
One potential downside: WhatsApp may become less inclined to work with companies that compete with Facebook, or vice versa. See, for reference, Instagram killing Twitter integration in 2012, several months after Twitter cut off its contact lists for Instagram users. We can only speculate that Facebook’s acquisition of Instagram — or Twitter’sprevious failed acquisition – had something to do with the bad blood.

So why is Facebook spending so much money for WhatsApp?

This is the fun part, because every tech pundit thinks they’ve figured out the “real” reason for the acquisition, when in reality everyone’s just making educated guesses.
If there is a “real” answer, it’s probably a combination of several theories, some of which are related. Here’s a sampling:
  • Facebook wants the photos. See the above statistics about how more people share photos on WhatsApp than on Facebook. It’s too big of an activity for Facebook not to own, says Sarah Lacy at PandoDaily.
  • Facebook is becoming a social media conglomerate. Kara Swisher at Re/Code paints Facebook as a Disney-like media giant. It may not be able to own every popular service, but it can become the dominant player with different tools like Instagram and WhatsApp in its arsenal. Each one does things that the other property can’t.
  • Facebook lives in fear of being disrupted in mobile. At this point, Facebook is pretty safe from becoming the next MySpace or Friendster, but it can’t risk losing peoples’ attention at the hands of newer, cooler apps, BuzzFeed’s John Herrman argues.
  • Facebook needs to expand its Europe and emerging markets presence. As TechCrunch’s Josh Constine notes, WhatsApp is huge in developing countries. Facebook could also use WhatsApp to help bring more people online through subsidized Internet, which Facebook already offers in some countries. The acquisition is a shortcut to owning those growing markets.
  • Facebook must buy its way into “ephemeral” and/or “dark social” communications. Just think about all the stuff you talk about, the photos you send and the links you share when you’re communicating privately — if not through WhatsApp then through something else like e-mail — instead of broadcasting to your Timeline. All that data is invisible to Facebook, unless you use Facebook Messenger. (And if Messenger was hugely popular, Facebook wouldn’t need WhatsApp.) WhatsApp can provide troves of data about the things we’re really interested in, which can then be used for targeted advertising on other Facebook properties. Alexis Madrigal’s 2012 post on Dark Social helps put this idea in context.
Oh, and Facebook’s official line is that it acquired WhatsApp to “make the world more open and connected,” which is probably as true as it is vague. Mark Zuckerberg always seems genuine in his world-changing ambitions, but there’s always the business side to keep in mind.
The overarching themes here are about attention and user data. WhatsApp has proven it can capture the former, and while Facebook says it has very little of the latter from WhatsApp, that can change, and messaging can become a rich data source for Facebook’s core advertising business. Perhaps that sounds scary, but it’s not much different from how Gmail works now.
How will we know when this starts happening? Just wait for the inevitable revision of privacy policies allowing WhatsApp and Facebook to freely share their data with one another.


Read more: Explained: What Is WhatsApp and Why Did Facebook Buy It? | TIME.com http://techland.time.com/2014/02/20/facebooks-whatsapp-acquisition-explained/#ixzz2tyU5o99y

Monday, February 10, 2014

Five sneaky email cheats


1) The sender's email and photo looks like an Indian. (A search on Google reveals that there is somebody working in accounting profession whose id is slightly similar to this id, https://www.google.com/search?q=arige.satish%40gmail.com&oq=arige.satish%40gmail.com)

2) Normally, only Muslim writes "Salam"

3) The name Mrs Wendy chow is not consistent with the email id and Salam greeting

4) Credit Controller does not issue payment.

5) In Malaysia, this telephone digit numbers is invalid.

Saturday, February 01, 2014

Anjakan Paradigma (Paradigm Shift)

Pernahkah anda mendengar tentang "Anjakan Paradigma"? (Paradigm Shift).

Disney pernah menolak idea tentang kartun animasi janaan komputer. Disney amat berbangga dengan hasil kerja manual seperti The Lion King. Walaubagaimanapun, anjakan paradigma berlaku apabila filem Toy Story berjaya di pawagam.

Siapakah di belakang kejayaan Toy Story? Steve Jobs.

Eh, macam muka sayalah! hehe.

Yahoo mail hacked: What to do if you’ve been affected


-----

Yahoo Mail users, we have some bad news: It’s time to change your e-mail password.
In a company blog post Thursday night, Yahoo revealed that a number of users’ passwords and usernames were exposed to cyber-attackers who used malicious computer software to gain access to lists of Yahoo Mail credentials.
The information was likely collected from a third-party database, Jay Rossiter, Yahoo’s senior vice president of platforms and personalization products, wrote in the posting.
The company is resetting passwords on accounts that have been affected and is taking steps to allow users to re-secure their accounts. It is sending notification e-mails instructing those users to change their passwords; users may also receive a text message, if they’ve shared their phone number with the company.
It’s a song-and-dance that users may be tiring of, but it is important for Yahoo account holders who were swept up in the attack to change their passwords for immediately. They should also change their log-in credentials for any account that may share their Yahoo password, particularly if they use their Yahoo e-mail as their username. The same is true if you use a similar e-mail address as the username — it’s not a big leap for hackers to think that you may be both jdoe@yahoo.com and jdoe@gmail.com.
Finally, everyone should also be on the lookout for spam, as the attack also appears to have picked up names and e-mail addresses for the most recent contacts from affected accounts, according to the company’s post.
If you get an odd e-mail from the Yahoo account of someone you know, ignore the message, and do not click on any links in the message. (It’s also be nice to let the person whose account has been hacked know about the fraudulent messages, so they can warn others to avoid the e-mails.)
Yahoo has apologized for the inconvenience and has said that it has taken “additional measures” to block attacks on its system. The company did not immediately respond to a request asking how many of its users were affected.
Yahoo is the world's second-largest e-mail provider, and has an estimated 273 million users, according to a report from the Associated Press.